Foreword

Competent leaders of character are necessary for the Army to meet the challenges in the
dangerous and complex security environment we face.
FM 6-22 is the Army’s keystone field manual on leadership. It establishes leadership
doctrine and fundamental principles for all officers, noncommissioned officers, and
Army civilians across all components.
This manual uses the BE-KNOW-DO concept to express what is required of Army
leaders. It is critical that Army leaders be agile, multiskilled pentathletes who have
strong moral character, broad knowledge, and keen intellect. They must display these
attributes and leader competencies bound by the concept of the Warrior Ethos. Leaders
must be committed to lifelong learning to remain relevant and ready during a career of
service to the Nation.
Army leaders must set the example, teach, and mentor, and this manual provides the
principles, concepts, and training to accomplish this important task on which America
depends.

PETER J. SCHOOMAKER
General, United States Army
Chief of Staff

Resilience-A Leadership Perspective

     Resilient leaders can recover quickly from setbacks, shock, injuries, adversity, and stress while
maintaining their mission and organizational focus. Their resilience rests on will, the inner drive that
compels them to keep going, even when exhausted, hungry, afraid, cold, and wet. Resilience helps leaders
and their organizations to carry difficult missions to their conclusion.
     Resilience and the will to succeed are not sufficient to carry the day during adversity. Competence
and knowledge guide the energies of a strong will to pursue courses of action that lead to success and
victory in battle. The leader’s premier task is to instill resilience and a winning spirit in subordinates. That
begins with tough and realistic training.
     Resilience is essential when pursuing mission accomplishment. No matter what the working
conditions are, a strong personal attitude helps prevail over any adverse external conditions. All members
of the Army—active, reserve, or civilian—will experience situations when it would seem easier to quit
rather than finish the task. During those times, everyone needs an inner source of energy to press on to
mission completion. When things go badly, a leader must draw on inner reserves to persevere.

Duty

Fulfill your obligations.

I go anywhere in the world they tell me to go, any time they tell me to, to fight anybody

they want me to fight. I move my family anywhere they tell me to move, on a day’s notice,

and live in whatever quarters they assign me. I work whenever they tell me to work….

And I like it.

James H. Webb

Former U.S. Marine and Secretary of the Navy (1987-1988)

Duty extends beyond everything required by law, regulation, and orders. Professionals work not just
to meet the minimum standard, but consistently strive to do their very best. Army leaders commit to
excellence in all aspects of their professional responsibility.

Part of fulfilling duty is to exercise initiative—anticipating what needs to be done before being told
what to do. Army leaders exercise initiative when they fulfill the purpose, not merely the letter, of the tasks
they have been assigned and the orders they have received. The task is not complete until the intended
outcome is achieved. When a platoon sergeant tells a squad leader to inspect weapons, the squad leader
only fulfills a minimum obligation when checking weapons. If the squad leader finds weapons that are not
clean or serviced, a sense of duty alerts the leader to go beyond the platoon sergeant’s instructions. To
fulfill that duty, squad leaders must correct the problem and ensure that all the unit’s weapons are up to
standard. When leaders take initiative, they also take full responsibility for their actions and those of their
subordinates. Conscientiousness is a human trait where duty is internalized. Conscientiousness means
having a high sense of responsibility for personal contributions to the Army, demonstrated through
dedicated effort, organization, thoroughness, reliability, and practicality. Conscientiousness consistently
alerts the leader to do what is right—even when tired or demoralized.

In rare cases, a leader’s sense of duty also has to detect and prevent an illegal order. Duty requires
refusal to obey it—leaders have no choice but to do what is ethically and legally right

Army Leadership-Formal and Informal

LEADER TEAMS

Leaders at all levels recognize the Army is a team as well as a team of teams. These teams interact as

numerous functional units, designed to perform necessary tasks and missions that in unison produce the

collective effort of all Army components. Everyone belongs to a team, serving as either leader or

responsible subordinate. For these teams to function at their best, leaders and followers must develop

mutual trust and respect, recognize existing talents, and willingly contribute talents and abilities for the

common good of the organization. Leadership within the teams that make up Army usually comes in two

forms:

•  Legitimate (formal).
•  Influential (informal).

FORMAL LEADERSHIP

Legitimate or formal leadership is granted to individuals by virtue of assignment to positions of

responsibility and is a function of rank and experience. The positions themselves are based on the leader’s

level of job experience and training. One selection process used for the assignment of legitimate authority

is the command selection board. Similar to a promotion board, the selection board uses past performance

and potential for success to select officers for command positions. NCOs assume legitimate authority when

assigned as a platoon sergeant, first sergeant, or command sergeant major. These positions bring with them

the duty to recommend disciplinary actions and advancement or promotion.

 

The Uniform Code of Military Justice supports military leaders in positions of legitimate authority.

Regardless of the quality of leadership exhibited by organizationally appointed leaders, they possess the

legal right to impose their will on subordinates, using legal orders and directives.

 

INFORMAL LEADERSHIP

Informal leadership can be found throughout organizations, and while it can play an important role

in mission accomplishment, it should never undermine legitimate authority. All members of the Army

could find themselves in a position to serve as a leader at any time. Informal leadership is not based on any

particular rank or position in the organizational hierarchy. It can arise from the knowledge gained from

experience and sometimes requires initiative on the part of the individual to assume responsibility not

designated to his position. Therefore, even the most junior member may be able to influence the decision of

the highest organizational authority. As the final decision maker, the formal leader is ultimately responsible

for legitimizing an informal leader’s course of action.