Character and Ethics-Army Leadership

 4-62. Adhering to the principles that the Army Values embody is essential to upholding high ethical standards of behavior. Unethical behavior quickly destroys organizational morale and cohesion—it undermines the trust and confidence essential to teamwork and mission accomplishment. Consistently doing the right thing forges strong character in individuals and expands to create a culture of trust throughout the organization.

4-63. Ethics are concerned with how a person should behave. Values represent the beliefs that a person has. The seven Army Values represent a set of common beliefs that leaders are expected to uphold and reinforce by their actions. The translation from desirable ethics to internal values to actual behavior involves choices. 

4-64. Ethical conduct must reflect genuine values and beliefs. Soldiers and Army civilians adhere to the Army Values because they want to live ethically and profess the values because they know what is right. Adopting good values and making ethical choices are essential to produce leaders of character.

4-65. In combat, ethical choices are not always easy. The right thing may not only be unpopular, but dangerous as well. Complex and dangerous situations often reveal who is a leader of character and who is not.

Leader Development

8-51. Leader development is a deliberate, continuous, sequential, and progressive process grounded in the
Army Values. It grows Soldiers and civilians into competent and confident leaders capable of directing
teams and organizations to execute decisive action. Leader development is achieved through the lifelong
synthesis of the knowledge, skills, and experiences gained through institutional training and education,
organizational training, operational experience, and self-development.

8-52. Leader development takes into consideration that military leaders are inherently Soldiers first and
must be technically and tactically proficient as well as adaptive to change. Army training and leader
development therefore centers on creating trained and ready units, led by competent and confident leaders.
The concept acknowledges an important interaction that trains Soldiers now and develops leaders for the
future.

8-53. The three core domains that shape the critical learning experiences throughout Soldiers’ and leaders’
careers are—

• Institutional training.
• Training, education, and job experience gained during operational assignments.
• Self-development.

From the Army Physical Readiness Training System

Soldier physical readiness is acquired through the challenge of a precise, progressive and integrated physical
training program. A well-conceived plan of military physical readiness training must be an integral part of every unit training program. This manual prescribes doctrine for the execution of the Army Physical Readiness Training (PRT) system.


The Army assesses, plans, prepares and executes training and leader development through training based on tasks, conditions and standards. Knowing the task, assessing the level of proficiency against the standard and developing a sustained or improved training plan is the essence of all Army training.

Army training overall prepares Soldiers, leaders and units to fight in the full spectrum of operations. Combat
readiness is the Army’s primary focus as it transitions to a more agile, versatile, lethal and survivable force.

The Oath

Upon taking the oath to become an Army leader, Soldiers, and Army civilians enter into a sacred agreement
with the Nation and their subordinates. The men and women of the Army are capable of extraordinary feats of
courage and sacrifice as they have proven on countless battlefields from the Revolutionary War to the War on
Terrorism. These Soldiers and Army civilians display great patience, persistence, and tremendous loyalty as
they perform their duty to the Nation in thousands of orderly rooms, offices, motor pools, and training areas
around the world, no matter how difficult, tedious, or risky the task. In return, they deserve competent,
professional, and ethical leadership. They expect their Army leaders to respect them as valued members of
effective and cohesive organizations and to embrace the essence of leadership.

Foreword

Competent leaders of character are necessary for the Army to meet the challenges in the
dangerous and complex security environment we face.
FM 6-22 is the Army’s keystone field manual on leadership. It establishes leadership
doctrine and fundamental principles for all officers, noncommissioned officers, and
Army civilians across all components.
This manual uses the BE-KNOW-DO concept to express what is required of Army
leaders. It is critical that Army leaders be agile, multiskilled pentathletes who have
strong moral character, broad knowledge, and keen intellect. They must display these
attributes and leader competencies bound by the concept of the Warrior Ethos. Leaders
must be committed to lifelong learning to remain relevant and ready during a career of
service to the Nation.
Army leaders must set the example, teach, and mentor, and this manual provides the
principles, concepts, and training to accomplish this important task on which America
depends.

PETER J. SCHOOMAKER
General, United States Army
Chief of Staff

Resilience-A Leadership Perspective

     Resilient leaders can recover quickly from setbacks, shock, injuries, adversity, and stress while
maintaining their mission and organizational focus. Their resilience rests on will, the inner drive that
compels them to keep going, even when exhausted, hungry, afraid, cold, and wet. Resilience helps leaders
and their organizations to carry difficult missions to their conclusion.
     Resilience and the will to succeed are not sufficient to carry the day during adversity. Competence
and knowledge guide the energies of a strong will to pursue courses of action that lead to success and
victory in battle. The leader’s premier task is to instill resilience and a winning spirit in subordinates. That
begins with tough and realistic training.
     Resilience is essential when pursuing mission accomplishment. No matter what the working
conditions are, a strong personal attitude helps prevail over any adverse external conditions. All members
of the Army—active, reserve, or civilian—will experience situations when it would seem easier to quit
rather than finish the task. During those times, everyone needs an inner source of energy to press on to
mission completion. When things go badly, a leader must draw on inner reserves to persevere.

The Basis of Leadership

The Basis of Leadership

     All Army team members, Soldiers and civilians alike, must have a basis of understanding
for what leadership is and does. The definitions of leadership and leaders address their
sources of strength in deep-rooted values, the Warrior Ethos, and professional
competence. National and Army values influence the leader’s character and professional
development, instilling a desire to acquire the essential knowledge to lead. Leaders
apply this knowledge within a spectrum of established competencies to achieve
successful mission accomplishment. The roles and functions of Army leaders apply to
the three interconnected levels of leadership: direct, organizational, and strategic. Within
these levels of leadership, cohesive teams can achieve collective excellence when
leadership levels interact effectively.

Army Leadership-Formal and Informal

LEADER TEAMS

Leaders at all levels recognize the Army is a team as well as a team of teams. These teams interact as

numerous functional units, designed to perform necessary tasks and missions that in unison produce the

collective effort of all Army components. Everyone belongs to a team, serving as either leader or

responsible subordinate. For these teams to function at their best, leaders and followers must develop

mutual trust and respect, recognize existing talents, and willingly contribute talents and abilities for the

common good of the organization. Leadership within the teams that make up Army usually comes in two

forms:

•  Legitimate (formal).
•  Influential (informal).

FORMAL LEADERSHIP

Legitimate or formal leadership is granted to individuals by virtue of assignment to positions of

responsibility and is a function of rank and experience. The positions themselves are based on the leader’s

level of job experience and training. One selection process used for the assignment of legitimate authority

is the command selection board. Similar to a promotion board, the selection board uses past performance

and potential for success to select officers for command positions. NCOs assume legitimate authority when

assigned as a platoon sergeant, first sergeant, or command sergeant major. These positions bring with them

the duty to recommend disciplinary actions and advancement or promotion.

 

The Uniform Code of Military Justice supports military leaders in positions of legitimate authority.

Regardless of the quality of leadership exhibited by organizationally appointed leaders, they possess the

legal right to impose their will on subordinates, using legal orders and directives.

 

INFORMAL LEADERSHIP

Informal leadership can be found throughout organizations, and while it can play an important role

in mission accomplishment, it should never undermine legitimate authority. All members of the Army

could find themselves in a position to serve as a leader at any time. Informal leadership is not based on any

particular rank or position in the organizational hierarchy. It can arise from the knowledge gained from

experience and sometimes requires initiative on the part of the individual to assume responsibility not

designated to his position. Therefore, even the most junior member may be able to influence the decision of

the highest organizational authority. As the final decision maker, the formal leader is ultimately responsible

for legitimizing an informal leader’s course of action.

Character Development from the US Army Leadership Manual

CHARACTER DEVELOPMENT
People join the Army as Soldiers and Army civilians with their character, pre-shaped by their
background, beliefs, education, and experience. An Army leader’s job would be simpler if merely checking
the team member’s personal values against the Army Values and developing a simple plan to align them
sufficed. Reality is much different. Becoming a person of character and a leader of character is a careerlong
process involving day-to-day experience, education, self-development, developmental counseling,
coaching, and mentoring. While individuals are responsible for their own character development, leaders
are responsible for encouraging, supporting, and assessing the efforts of their people. Leaders of character
can develop only through continual study, reflection, experience, and feedback. Leaders hold themselves
and subordinates to the highest standards. The standards and values then spread throughout the team, unit,
or organization and ultimately throughout the Army.
Doing the right thing is good. Doing the right thing for the right reason and with the right goal is
better. People of character must possess the desire to act ethically in all situations. One of the Army
leader’s primary responsibilities is to maintain an ethical climate that supports development of such
character. When an organization’s ethical climate nurtures ethical behavior, people will, over time, think,
feel, and act ethically. They will internalize the aspects of sound character.